Monday, October 27, 2008

Tit-for-Tat extreme

Prof. Z has talked a bit about how eBay has changed the feedback system on their site. Before, both sellers and buyers could leave positive or negative feeback on buyers and sellers, respectively. While this system was still in place, the sellers were likely to get angry after recieving negative feedback, therefore giving their buyers bad feedback in retaliation.

Now, however, sellers can no longer leave negative feedback for their buyers. This is something that has caused the eBay sellers to file lawsuits on the buyers who leave bad comments.

Joel Jones filed a lawsuit against Chris Read after Read left less than desireable comments after buying something from Jones. Read bought a phone and was told that it was in good conditions. The product that came was in miserable condition and not even the model that Read thought he was buying. He sent it back to Jones and asked for a refund, and leaving negative feedback on eBay about the phone that was sent to him.

Jones gave Read his money back, but beforehand he claimed that the feedback left by Read was hurting his business and his sales were down. He threatened to take Read to court if he didn't delete the comments, but Read responded telling him that if court was the next step, he was willing to go there. Jones believes that giving Read the refund should have merited positive feedback, telling reporters that Read's comments were uncalled for.

Court was what Read got. Lawsuits as a result of sellers not being able to give their buyers feedback may have an effect on how many people actually buy on eBay. This would be disastrous for the people who's business is to sell online. If sellers attacking buyers through legal action continues, then who knows what will happen to eBay!

1 comment:

Matt Dudek said...

I disagree with the courts decision to not allow negative feedback on the ebay product. I would like to know if a product is defective or the service is poor before I purchase the item. As long as the negative feedback is thought as constructive criticism and not meant to bash the company it should be allowed. That's just my two cents.